4.5 Article

Recombinant human parainfluenza virus type 2 vaccine candidates containing a 3′ genomic promoter mutation and L polymerase mutations are attenuated and protective in non-human primates

期刊

VACCINE
卷 25, 期 34, 页码 6409-6422

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.06.028

关键词

human parainfluenza virus; live attenuated vaccine candidates; non-human primate study

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AI000327-26] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously, we identified several attenuating mutations in the L polymerase protein of human parainfluenza virus type 2 (HPIV2) and genetically stabilized those mutations using reverse genetics [Nolan SM, Surman S, Amaro-CarambotE, Collins PL, Murphy BR, Skiadopoulos MH. Live-attenuated intranasal parainfluenza virus type 2 vaccine candidates developed by reverse genetics containing L polymerase protein mutations imported from heterologous paramyxoviruses. Vaccine 2005;39(23):4765-74]. Here we describe the discovery of an attenuating mutation at nucleotide 15 (15 (T -> C)) in the 3' genomic promoter that was also present in the previously characterized mutants. We evaluated the properties of this promoter mutation alone and in various combinations with the L polymerase mutations. Amino acid substitutions at L protein positions 460 (460A or 460P) or 948 (948L), or deletion of amino acids 1724 and 1725 (A 1724), each conferred a temperature sensitivity (ts) phenotype whereas the 15 (T -> C) Mutation did not. The 460A and 948L mutations each contributed to restricted replication in the lower respiratory tract of African green monkeys, but the A 1724 mutation increased attenuation only in certain combinations with other mutations. We constructed two highly attenuated viruses, rV94(15C)/46OA/948L and rV94(15C)/948L/Delta 1724, that were immunogenic and protective against challenge with wild-type HPTV2 in African green monkeys and, therefore, appear to be suitable for evaluation in humans. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据