4.5 Article

Efficacy of recombinant annexin 2 for fibrinolytic therapy in a rat embolic stroke model: A magnetic resonance imaging study

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1165, 期 -, 页码 135-143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.039

关键词

annexin 2; cerebral ischemia; fibrinolysis; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01-NS45879, R01 NS045879, R01 NS045879-05, R01 NS045879-06, R01 NS045879-01A1, R01 NS045879-02, R01 NS045879-03, R01 NS045879-04] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficacy of recombinant annexin 2 (rAN II) in a rat model of embolic stroke was examined using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histology. The right middle cerebral artery of male Wistar rats was occluded by autologous clots under anesthesia. Four doses of rAN II (0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg, n=10 for each group) or saline (1 ml/kg, n=10) were administrated intravenously within 5 min before clot infusion. Serial changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and relative blood flow (CBF) were measured with the use of MRI in half of the animals in each group. The remaining half of the animals in each group was evaluated for hemorrhage and final infarct size by histology at 48 h after embolization. At 3 h after embolization, lesion volumes with ADC were abnormality and CBF in the peripheral lesion was improved in groups treated with 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg, but not 0.125 mg/kg, of rAN II in comparison with the saline-treated group (P < 0.05). Histological analyses were consistent with MRI findings. More importantly, no hemorrhagic transformation was documented in rats treated with 0.125 and 0.2S mg/kg of rAN II, whereas it was observed at higher doses. We concluded that rAN II at 0.25 mg/kg significantly reduced infarct size and improved CBF without hemorrhagic complications. rAN II is a novel compound that has the potential to be a promising fibrinolytic agent to treat embolic stroke. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据