4.7 Article

Optimization of the structure-switching aptamer-based fluorescence polarization assay for the sensitive tyrosinamide sensing

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 707, 期 1, 页码 191-196

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.09.022

关键词

Aptamer; Fluorescence polarization; Structure switching; Complementary strand

资金

  1. SEST-Micraptox ANR [2007-013-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a structure-switching aptamer assay based on a fluorescence polarization (FP) signal transduction approach and dedicated to the L-tyrosinamide sensing was described and optimized. A fluorescently labelled complementary strand (CS) of the aptamer central region was used as a probe. The effects of critical parameters such as buffer composition and pH, temperature, aptamer:CS stoichiometry, nature of the dye (Fluorescein (F) or Texas Red (TR)) and length of the CS (15-, 12-, 9- and 6-mer) on the assay analytical performances were evaluated. Under optimized experimental conditions (10 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM MgCl2 and 25 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 temperature of 22 degrees C and stoichiometry 1:1), the results showed that, for a 12-mer CS, the F dye moderately increased the method sensitivity in comparison to the TR label. The F labelled 9-mer CS, however, did not allow the hybrid formation with the functional nucleic acid, thus emphasizing the importance of the nature of the fluorophore. In contrast, the same 9-mer CS labelled with the TR dye was able to effectively associate with the aptamer and was easily displaced upon target binding as demonstrated by a significant improvement of the sensitivity and a detection limit of 250 nM, comparable to those reported with direct aptasensing methods. The present study demonstrates that not only the CS length but also the nature of the dye played a preponderant role in the performance of the structure-switching aptamer assay, highlighting the importance of interdependently controlling these two factors for an optimal FP-based sensing platform. (C) 2011 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据