4.7 Article

A tutorial on support vector machine-based methods for classification problems in chemometrics

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 665, 期 2, 页码 129-145

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.03.030

关键词

Support vector machine; Least squares support vector machine; Kernel logistic regression; Kernel-based learning; Feature selection; Multi-class probabilities

资金

  1. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen)
  2. Research Council KUL: GOA-AMBioRICS [IDO 05/010 EEG-fMRI, GOA/2004105]
  3. Flemish Government: FWO [G.0360.05, G.0519.06, G.0341.07, G.0321. 06, G.0302.07, G.0566.06]
  4. IWT
  5. Belgian Federal Government: DWTC [IUAP IV-02, IUAP V-22]
  6. Dynamical Systems and Control: Computation, Identification Modelling
  7. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office [IUAP P6/04]
  8. EU: BIOPATTERN [FP6-2002-IST 508803]
  9. eTUMOUR [FP6-2002-LIFESCIHEALTH 503094]
  10. HealthAgents [FP6-2005-IST 027213]
  11. FAST [FP6-019279-2]
  12. ESA: Cardiovascular Control [Prodex-8 C90242]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This tutorial provides a concise overview of support vector machines and different closely related techniques for pattern classification. The tutorial starts with the formulation of support vector machines for classification. The method of least squares support vector machines is explained. Approaches to retrieve a probabilistic interpretation are covered and it is explained how the binary classification techniques can be extended to multi-class methods. Kernel logistic regression, which is closely related to iteratively weighted least squares support vector machines, is discussed. Different practical aspects of these methods are addressed: the issue of feature selection, parameter tuning, unbalanced data sets, model evaluation and statistical comparison. The different concepts are illustrated on three real-life applications in the field of metabolomics, genetics and proteomics. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据