4.7 Article

Comparison of several extraction techniques for multiclass analysis of veterinary drugs in eggs using ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 661, 期 2, 页码 150-160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.12.016

关键词

Ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography; Extraction method; Multiclass analysis; Veterinary drugs; Eggs

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation-FEDER [AGL2007-63569]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AP2008-02811]
  3. Ramon y Cajal Program (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared four extraction methods for the simultaneous determination of tetracyclines, macrolides, quinolones, sulphonamides and anthelmintics (including benzimidazoles and avermectins) in eggs by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Solvent extraction. solid-phase extraction (SPE). matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) and modified QuEChERS procedure were compared in terms of recovery and number of veterinary drugs extracted. The solvent extraction procedure with a clean-up step provided better results than the other tested procedures. The QuEChERS procedure was simpler and faster, but extracted fewer compounds than solvent extraction. MSPD did not extract tetracyclines and quinolones, whereas macrolides and tetracyclines were not extracted when SPE was applied. The solvent extraction procedure was validated, obtaining recoveries ranging from 60% (sulfaquinoxaline) to 119% (levamisole) with repeatability values (expressed as relative standard deviations, RSDs) lower than 20% at two concentration levels (10 and 100 mu g kg(-1)), except for erythromycin, emamectin and ivermectin that showed RSD values close to 25% at 10 mu g kg(-1). Limits of quantification (LOQs) were always equal or lower than 5 mu g kg(-1). Finally the method was applied to egg samples, and erythromycin, enrofloxacin, difloxacin, thiabendazole, emamectin and fenbendazole were detected in four samples. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据