4.7 Article

Novel approaches in analysis of Fusarium mycotoxins in cereals employing ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 662, 期 1, 页码 51-61

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.12.034

关键词

Fusarium mycotoxins; Quick easy cheap effective rugged and safe; Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography; Time of flight mass spectrometry; Orbitrap mass spectrometry

资金

  1. National Agency of Agricultural Research (NAZV) of the Czech Republic [NAZV 11353043]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [NPV II 2B08049, MSM 6046137305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid, simple and cost-effective analytical methods with performance characteristics matching regulatory requirements are needed for effective control of occurrence of Fusarium toxins in cereals and cereal-based products to which they might be transferred during processing. Within this study, two alternative approaches enabling retrospective data analysis and identification of unknown signals in sample extracts have been implemented and validated for determination of 11 major Fusarium toxins. In both cases, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (U-HPLC) coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was employed. C-13 isotopically labeled surrogates as well as matrix-matched standards were employed for quantification. As far as time of flight mass analyzer (TOF-MS) was a detection tool, the use of modified QuEChERS (quick easy cheap effective rugged and safe) sample preparation procedure, widely employed in multi-pesticides residue analysis, was shown as an optimal approach to obtain low detection limits. The second challenging alternative, enabling direct analysis of crude extract, was the use of mass analyzer based oil Orbitrap technology. In addition to demonstration of full compliance of the new methods with Commission Regulation (EC) No. 401/2006, also their potential to be used for confirmatory purposes according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC has been critically assessed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据