4.7 Article

Impaired trigeminal nociceptive processing in patients with trigeminal neuralgia

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 835-841

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000269670.30045.6b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) usually leads to paroxysms of short lasting but very severe pain. Between the attacks the patient is usually asymptomatic, but a constant dull background pain may persist in some cases. The mechanisms associated with the development of this chronic pain are not well understood. Objective: To determine trigeminal nociceptive fiber impairment in patients with TN comparing symptomatic and nonsymptomatic sides using the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) and pain-related evoked potentials (PREP) and to identify possible central mechanisms of pain chronicity. Methods: We investigated 24 patients with TN without and 18 patients with TN with concomitant chronic facial pain. PREP and nBR were investigated following nociception specific electrical stimulation on both sides of the face and in each division of the trigeminal nerve (V1, V2, and V3). Results: We found prolonged PREP and nBR latencies and reduced amplitudes comparing symptomatic and nonsymptomatic sides in all patients with TN. In patients with chronic facial pain, however, PREP amplitudes were larger and latencies shorter compared to patients with TN without facial pain, while nBR results were similar across groups. Conclusion: The data suggest an impairment of the trigeminal nociceptive system due to demyelination and/or axonal dysfunction on the symptomatic side and locate this defect close to the root entry zone in the brainstem. Moreover, central facilitation of trigeminal nociceptive processing was observed in patients with trigeminal neuralgia with concomitant chronic facial pain indicating overactivation of central sensory transmission. This may represent a possible adaptive mechanism for the development of chronic pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据