4.4 Article

Isolation, growth and differentiation of hair cell progenitors from the newborn rat cochlear greater epithelial ridgele

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 164, 期 2, 页码 271-279

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.05.009

关键词

hearing loss; hair cell regeneration; progenitor cells; GER; spheres

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian cochlear hair cell loss is irreversible and leads to permanent hearing loss. To restore hearing physiologically, it is necessary to generate new functional hair cells either from endogenous cells or from exogenously transplanted hair cells/progenitors. Previous studies suggest that cochlear greater epithelial ridge (GER) and lesser epithelial ridge (LER) cells are capable of differentiating into hair cells. While it was recently possible to obtain and culture pure LER progenitors, isolation of pure GER progenitors has not been reported. Here we describe a method that allows isolation of pure GER cells from neonatal rat cochleae. The cochlear epithelial sheet (CES) containing GER progenitor cells was mechanically separated from the underlying mesenchymal tissue after digestion with thermolysin. The GER area could then be dissected following mechanical removal of organ of Corti as well as all the lateral area. The isolated GER cells showed significant proliferation and expressed markers for GER cells but not markers for hair cells or LER. When the GER cells were cultured in serum-free medium containing epidermal growth factor, spheres were formed where they continued to proliferate. Furthermore, when GER cells were induced to express Hath 1 or co-cultured with mesenchymal cells prepared from neonate rat cochleae, they showed the potential to differentiate into hair cell-like cells. Successful isolation, culture and differentiation of GER hair cell progenitors will shed additional light on the mechanism of hair cell differentiation and potential hair cell replacement. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据