4.7 Article

Aging impairs insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in rat skeletal muscle via suppressing AMPKα

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 535-543

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/emm.2007.59

关键词

5'-AMP-activated protein kinase; aging; glucose transporter type 4; insulin resistance; muscle; skeletal; rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insufficient intracellular fat oxidation is an important contributor to aging-related insulin resistance, while the precise mechanism underlying is unclear. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an important regulator of intracellular fat oxidation and was evidenced to play a key role in high-glucose and high-fat induced glucose intolerance. In the present study, we investigated whether altered AMPK expression or activity was also involved in aging-related insulin resistance. Insulin sensitivity of rats' skeletal muscles was evaluated using in-vitro glucose uptake assay. Activity of a subunit of AMPK (AMPK alpha) was evaluated by measuring the phosphorylation of both AMPKa ((P-AMPK alpha) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (P-ACC), while expression of AMPKa was assessed by determining the mRNA levels of AMPK(alpha 1 and AMPK alpha 2, and protein contents of AMPKa. Compared with 4-month old rats, 24-month old rats exhibited obviously impaired insulin sensitivity. At the same time, AMPK alpha activity significantly decreased, while AMPKa expression did not alter during aging. Glucose transporter 4 expression also decreased in old rats. Compared with 24-month old rats, administration of the specific activator of AMPK, 5-aminolmidazole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR), significantly elevated AMPKa activity and GluT4 expression. Also, aging-related insulin resistance was significantly ameliorated by AICAR treatment. In conclusion, aging-related insulin resistance is associated with impaired AMPKa activity and could be ameliorated by AICAR, thus indicating a possible role of AMPK in aging-induced insulin resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据