4.7 Article

Luminol/antibody labeled gold nanoparticles for chemiluminescence immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 666, 期 1-2, 页码 91-96

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.03.059

关键词

Chemiluminescence; Immunoassay; Luminol; Gold nanoparticles; Carcinoembryonic antigen

资金

  1. Educational Administration Foundation of Shandong Province [J08LC07]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [20775038]
  3. Qingdao University of Science and Technology [0022415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile strategy by loading luminol and secondary antibody on gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) was described in the present work. The as-prepared luminol/antibody labeled Au NPs conjugates (LAAu NPs) were used as the chemiluminescent probe for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in serum. The LAAu NPs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). UV-vis spectrophotometry (UV-vis), and chemiluminescent method. Stable and efficient chemiluminescence (CL) was obtained when luminol molecules and secondary antibodies were coimmobilized on the Au NPs by using hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) as an oxidant, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as a catalyst, and 4-(4'-iodo)phenylphenol (IPP) as an enhancer. The LAAu NPs were further evaluated via a sandwich-type CL immunoassay of CEA in serum. In this protocol, the CEA analyte was captured by the primary antibody immobilized on the surface of magnetic beads, and then was sandwiched by the secondary antibody loaded on luminol-labeled Au NPs. The chemiluminescent intensity was proportional to the concentration of CEA over the range of 5.0 x 10(-10) to 5.0 x 10(-8) g mL(-1) and 5.0 x 10(-9) to 2.0 x 10(-8) g mL(-1) by using HRP and Co(2+) as catalysts, respectively. The present chemiluminescent immunoassay based on the luminol/antibody labeled Au NPs conjugates has offered great promise for simple, highly biocompatible, and cost-effective analysis of biological samples. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据