4.5 Article

Nitrotyrosylation of Ca2+ channels prevents c-Src kinase regulation of colonic smooth muscle Contractility in experimental colitis

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.107.123075

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK46367] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Basal levels of c-Src kinase are known to regulate smooth muscle Ca2+ channels. Colonic inflammation results in attenuated Ca2+ currents and muscle contraction. Here, we examined the regulation of calcium influx-dependent contractility by c-Src kinase in experimental colitis. Ca2+-influx induced contractions were measured by isometric tension recordings of mouse colonic longitudinal muscle strips depolarized by high K+. The E-max to CaCl2 was significantly less in inflamed tissues (38.4 +/- 7.6%) than controls, indicative of reduced Ca2+ influx. PP2 [4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine], a selective Src kinase inhibitor, significantly reduced the contractile amplitude and shifted the pD(2) from 3.88 to 2.44 in controls, whereas it was ineffective in inflamed tissues (3.66 versus 3.43). After pretreatment with a SIN-1 (3-morpholinosydnonimine)/peroxynitrite combination, the maximal contraction to CaCl2 was reduced by 46 +/- 7% in controls but unaffected in inflamed tissues (13 +/- 11%). Peroxynitrite also prevented the inhibitory effect of PP2 in control tissues. In colonic single smooth muscle cells, PP2 inhibited Ca2+ currents by 84.1 +/- 3.9% in normal but only 36.2 +/- 13% in inflamed tissues. Neither the Ca2+ channel Ca-v 1.2b, gene expression, nor the c-Src kinase activity was altered by inflammation. Western blot analysis showed no change in the Ca2+ channel protein expression but increased nitrotyrosylated-Ca2+ channel proteins during inflammation. These data suggest that post-translational modification of Ca2+ channels during inflammation, possibly nitrotyrosylation, prevents c-Src kinase regulation resulting in decreased Ca2+ influx.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据