4.4 Article

Fast evaluation of scaled opposite spin second-order Moller-Plesset correlation energies using auxiliary basis expansions and exploiting sparsity

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 1953-1964

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20590

关键词

auxiliary basis expansions; locality; sparsity; natural blocking; SOS-MP2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The scaled opposite spin Moller-Plesset method (SOS-MP2) is an economical way of obtaining correlation energies that are computationally cheaper, and yet, in a statistical sense, of higher quality than standard MP2 theory, by introducing one empirical parameter. But SOS-MP2 still has a fourth-order scaling step that makes the method inapplicable to very large molecular systems. We reduce the scaling of SOS-MP2 by exploiting the sparsity of expansion coefficients and local integral matrices, by performing local auxiliary basis expansions for the occupied-virtual product distributions. To exploit sparsity of 3-index local quantities, we use a blocking scheme in which entire zero-rows and columns, for a given third global index, are deleted by comparison against a numerical threshold. This approach minimizes sparse matrix book-keeping overhead, and also provides sufficiently large submatrices after blocking, to allow efficient matrix-matrix multiplies. The resulting algorithm is formally cubic scaling, and requires only moderate computational resources (quadratic memory and disk space) and, in favorable cases, is shown to yield effective quadratic scaling behavior in the size regime we can apply it to. Errors associated with local fitting using the attenuated Coulomb metric and numerical thresholds in the blocking procedure are found to be insignificant in terms of the predicted relative energies. A diverse set of test calculations shows that the size of system where significant computational savings can be achieved depends strongly on the dimensionality of the system, and the extent of localizability of the molecular orbitals. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据