4.7 Article

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry for metabonomics: Biomarker discovery for diabetes mellitus

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 633, 期 2, 页码 257-262

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.11.058

关键词

Metabonomics; Metabolomics; GC x GC-TOFMS; Biomarker; Diabetes mellitus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20775078, 20675082]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB503902, 2007CB914701]
  3. Knowledge Innovation Program [KSCXI-YW-02, K2006A13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC x GC-TOFMS) coupled with pattern recognition methods was applied to analyze plasma from diabetic patients and healthy controls. After sample preparation and GC x GC-TCFMS analysis, collected data were transformed, the peak alignment between different chromatograms was performed to generate the metabolites' peak table, then orthogonal signal correction filtered partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OSC-PLSDA) was carried out to model the data and discover metabolites with a significant concentration change in diabetic patients. With the method above, diabetic patients and healthy controls could be correctly distinguished based on the metabolic abnormity in plasma. Five potential biomarkers including glucose, 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid, linoleic acid, palmitic acid and phosphate were identified. It was found that elevated free fatty acids were essential pathophysiological factors in diabetes mellitus which reflected either the hyperglycemia or the deregulation of fatty acids metabolism. These potential biomarkers in plasma, e.g. palmitic acid, linoleic acid and 2-hydroxybutyric acid might be helpful in the diagnosis or further study of diabetes mellitus. This study shows the practicability and advantage of GC x GC-TOFMS coupled with data analysis and mining for metabonomics in biomarker discovery. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据