3.8 Article

Increase in nuclease resistance and incorporation of NF-κB decoy oligodeoxynucteotides by modification of the 3′-terminus

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 812-819

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.1077

关键词

NF-kappa B;; decoy; ODN; vascular smooth muscle cells; gene therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background For the development of molecular therapy based on oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN), ODN have to be stable against nucleases and be specific to the target transcription factor. To decrease non-specific binding and degradation from the T-terminus of ODN, we designed partially annealed ODN by binding the extremities of two single strands, resulting in a ribbon-shaped ODN, so called ribbon-type decoy ODN (R-ODN). Methods We evaluated the efficiency in the process of enzymatic ligation of R-ODN, the binding activity to nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B), and the stability against Exonuclease III and nucleases present in serum. The functional activity of R-ODN to inhibit NF-kappa B in vitro was evaluated in human aortic smooth muscle cells (VSMC): TNF-alpha-induced proliferation rate and MMP-9 expression were assessed after R-ODN transfection. Results and conclusions Although R-ODN have a phosphodiester backbone, their physical conformation was designed to provide nuclease resistance without interfering with their binding activity. As expected R-ODN showed, more resistance to exonucleases and stability in 100% serum than non-modified decoy ODN (N-ODN). Importantly, the R-ODN construction did not interfere with its binding activity to NF-kappa B, similar to N-ODN. Transfection of R-ODN significantly inhibited the expression of MMP-9 induced by TNF-alpha in VSMC as assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and R-ODN also inhibited the proliferation of VSMC induced by TNF-alpha (10 ng/ml), similar to phosphorothioate decoy ODN. Overall, the development of ribbon NF-kappa B decoy ODN could provide a useful tool for basic and clinical research. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据