4.7 Article

DNA based gold nanoparticles colorimetric sensors for sensitive and selective detection of Ag(I) ions

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 644, 期 1-2, 页码 78-82

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.04.022

关键词

Colorimetric sensors; Gold nanoparticles; Ag(I) ions; Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA); Cytosine base

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20675076]
  2. National Key Technology RD Program [2006BAE03B08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we reported both unlabeled and labeled sensing strategies for Ag(I) ions detection by using the DNA based gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) colorimetric method. In the unlabeled strategy, C-base riched single strand DNA (C-ssDNA) enwinded onto AuNPs to form AuNPs/C-ssDNA complex. In the labeled method, sulfhydryl group modified C-ssDNA (HS-C-ssDNA) was covalently labeled on AuNPs to produce AuNPs-S-C-ssDNA complex. In both strategies, C-ss DNA or HS-C-ssDNA could enhance the AuNPs stability against the salt-induced aggregation. However, the presence of Ag(I) ions in the obtained AuNPs/C-ssDNA or AuNPs-S-C-ssDNA complex would decrease such stability to display purple even blue colors due to the formation of Ag(I) ions mediated C-Ag(I)-C base pairs. Through this phenomenon, Ag(I) ions could be detected qualitatively and quantitatively using both unlabeled and labeled sensing strategies. Compared with the labeled method, the unlabeled strategy avoided the label and separation steps in common sensors, which may thus save both the time and cost for the detection. Nevertheless, the labeled strategy provided more sensitive, stable and controllable sensing results compared with the unlabeled method. By the labeled strategy, 12 nM Ag(I) ions could be observed directly by naked eyes, and the lowest detectable concentration of 0.59 nM was gotten under by the UV-vis spectra measurement, which was one of the most sensitive results among DNA based AuNPs colorimetric sensors for metal ions. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据