4.8 Article

Inactivation of srnad4 accelerates KrasG12D-Mediated pancreatic neoplasia

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 17, 页码 8121-8130

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4167

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P20 CA101955] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most fatal human malignancies, with an overall 5-year survival rate of < 5%. Genetic analysis of PDAC patient samples has shown that specific disease-associated mutations are correlated with histologically defined stages of neoplastic progression in the ductal epithelium. Activating mutations in KRAS are almost uniformly present in early-stage disease, with subsequent inactivating mutations in p16(INK4A), p53, and SAMD4 occurring in more advanced lesions. In this study, we have tested whether the loss of Smad4 would cooperate with an activating Kras(G12D) mutation to promote progression to PDAC using the Pdvl-Cre transgenic system to activate Kras(G12D) and delete Smad4 in all pancreatic lineages including the ductal epithelium. Analysis of double-mutant mice showed that loss of Smad4 significantly accelerated the progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (mPanIN) and promoted a high incidence of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia and active fibrosis compared with Pdx1-Cre;Kras(G12D) or Pdx1-Cre;Smad4(lox/lox) mice. Occasionally, double-mutant mice progressed to locally invasive PDAC with little evidence of metastases by 6 months of age and without the detectable loss of p53 or p16(Ink4A) expression or function. The loss of Smad4 only seemed to promote disease progression in the presence of the activated Kras(G12D) allele because we observed no abnormal pathology within the pancreata of 23 Pdx1-Cre;Smad4(lox/lox) animals that were analyzed up to 8 months of age. This indicates that Smad4 is dispensable for normal pancreatic development but is critical for at least partial suppression of multiple Kras(G12D)-dependent disease-associated phenotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据