4.3 Article

Using social judgment theory to study occupational therapists' use of information when making driver licensing recommendations for older and functionally impaired adults

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
卷 61, 期 5, 页码 493-502

出版社

AMER OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.61.5.493

关键词

clinical reasoning; driver licensing; driving; geriatrics; social judgment theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. This study sought to identify the informational cues that driver-assessor-trained occupational therapists (DATOTs) consider when making driver licensing recommendations for older and functionally impaired clients. Relatively little research supports these complex decisions. METHOD. A survey using a social judgment theory framework was mailed to all practicing registered DATOTs in Victoria, Australia. RESULTS. Cue mean rank order, as calculated across the 56 responses (return rate, 78%), revealed that the four most important cues were driving instructor interventions, driver behavior, cognitive and perceptual skills,. and vehicle handling skills. Substantial individual variations in cue ranks were not attributable to respondents' years of experience. CONCLUSION. Because driver licensing recommendations may have a major impact on clients' lives, debate and further study concerning information use are needed to assist DATOTs in making consistent and optimal licensing recommendations to ensure the safety of all road users and avoid when possible the negative consequences of license loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据