4.7 Article

In vitro fertilization improves childhood growth and metabolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 92, 期 9, 页码 3441-3445

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-2465

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is limited information regarding the long-term outcome of children born after in vitro fertilization ( IVF), although an increase in rare imprinted gene disorders such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome has been reported. Methods: We recruited healthy, prepubertal children born at term after singleton pregnancy. The children in the study group were conceived using IVF with fresh embryo transfer, whereas controls were naturally conceived. Anthropometric measurements, bone age, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, fasting serum glucose, insulin, lipid profile, IGF-I and -II, and IGF-binding proteins 1, 2, and 3 were performed. Results: There were 69 IVF children aged 5.9 +/- 0.2 yr and 71 control children aged 6.9 yr. IVF children were taller than controls when corrected for parents' heights ( height SD score of 1.05 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.51 coproduct 0.11, P = 0.001) with higher levels of serum IGF-II ( 850 +/- 24 vs. 773 +/- 24 mu g/liter, P = 0.03), higher IGF-I to IGF-binding protein 3 ratio ( P = 0.04), and a trend toward higher IGF-I ( 105 +/- 4 vs. 92 +/- 4 mu g/liter, P = 0.06). IVF children had higher high-density lipoprotein ( 1.67 +/- 0.04 mmol/liter vs. 1.53 +/- 0.04 mmol/liter, P = 0.02), lower triglycerides ( 0.65 +/- 0.04 mmol/liter vs. 0.78 +/- 0.04 mmol/liter, P = 0.02), and a lower total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio ( 2.58 vs. 2.86, P = 0.01). There were no differences in body composition. Conclusions: IVF children are taller with higher IGF-I and IGF-II levels and have a slightly more favorable lipid profile. We speculate that IVF results in epigenetic change through altered methylation of genes involved in growth and metabolism. IVF programs should consider long-term longitudinal follow-up of IVF offspring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据