4.7 Article

Development and characterization of a new conducting carbon composite electrode

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 635, 期 1, 页码 71-78

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.01.012

关键词

Graphite; Cellulose acetate; Composite electrode; Neutral red; Ascorbate

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/QUI/65255/2006, PTDC/QUI/65732/2006]
  2. European Community Fund FEDER [POCI 2010]
  3. CEMUC(R)
  4. MMB [SFRH/BD/27864/2006]
  5. EMP [SFRH/BD/31483/2006]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/31483/2006] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new conducting composite flexible material prepared from cellulose acetate (CA) polymer and graphite has been developed and used for the fabrication of electrodes, which were then characterized by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to provide information concerning the morphology of the composite electrode surface. The potential window, background currents and capacitance were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry in the pH range from 4.6 to 8.2. The voltammetry of model electroactive species demonstrates a close to reversible electrochemical behaviour, under linear diffusion control. The electroactive area of the composite electrodes increases after appropriate electrode polishing and electrochemical pre-treatment. The electrodes were used as substrate for the electropolymerisation of the phenazine dye neutral red, for future use as redox mediator in electrochemical biosensors. The composite electrodes were also successfully used for the amperometric detection of ascorbate at 0.0V vs. SCE, and applied to the measurement of ascorbate in Vitamin C tablets; the sensor exhibits high sensitivity and a low detection limit of 7.7 mu M. Perspectives for use as a versatile, mechanically flexible and robust composite electrode of easily adaptable dimensions are indicated. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据