4.7 Article

Potential antioxidant compounds in Mallotus species fingerprints. Part I: Indication, using linear multivariate calibration techniques

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 652, 期 1-2, 页码 189-197

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.08.024

关键词

Fingerprints; Antioxidant activity; Multivariate calibration; Indication of peaks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some Mallotus species are used in traditional medicine in Vietnam and China. Some also show interesting activities, such as antioxidant and cytotoxic ones. Combining fingerprint technology with data-handling techniques allows indicating the peaks potentially responsible for given activities. In this study it is aspired to indicate from chromatographic fingerprints the peaks potentially responsible for the antioxidant activity of several Mallotus species. Relevant information was extracted using linear multivariate calibration techniques, both before and after alignment of the fingerprints with correlation optimized warping (COW). From the studied techniques, stepwise multiple linear regression is least recommended as it made an inadequate variable selection. Principal component regression theoretically can take largely varying variables uncorrelated to the antioxidant activity into account. However, in practice in the actual case study this problem was limited. These problems in principle do not occur using partial least squares (PLS) models. Of the tested PLS methods, orthogonal projections to latent structures was preferred because of its simplicity, reproducibility. reduced model complexity and improved interpretability of the regression coefficients, yielding a clearer view on the individual contribution of the compounds. Furthermore, reducing analysis times from 60 min to 35 and 22.5 min resulted in the same main compounds, indicated responsible for the antioxidant activity. Models built after alignment by COW did not result in additional information. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据