4.6 Article

Peripheral tolerance and the qualitative characteristics of autoreactive T cell clones in primary biliary cirrhosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 5, 页码 3315-3324

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.3315

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 39588] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary biliary cirrhosis is characterized by autoreactive T cells specific for the mitochondrial Ag PDC-E2(163-176-) We studied the ability of eight T cell clones (TCC) specific for PDC-E2(163-176) to proliferate or become anergic in the presence of costimulation signals. TCC were stimulated with either human PDC-E2,(163-176), an Escherichia coli 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase mimic (OGDCE2(34-47)), or analogs with amino acid substitutions using HLA-matched allogeneic PBMC or mouse L-DR53 fibroblasts as APC. Based on their differential responses to these peptides (human PDC-E2(163-176), E. coli OGDC-E2(34-47)) in the different APC systems, TCC were classified as costimulation dependent or independent. Only costimulation-dependent TCC could become anergic. TCC with costimulation-dependent responses to OGDGE2 become anergic to PDGE2 when preincubated with mimic, even if costimulation is independent for PDGE2(163-176), Anergic TCC produced IL-10. One selected TCC could not become anergic after preincubation with PDC-E2(163-176-)pulsed L-DR53 but became anergic using L-DR53 pulsed with PDGE2 peptide analogs with a substitution at a critical TCR binding site. TCC that only respond to peptide-pulsed PBMC, but not L-DR53, proliferate with peptide-pulsed CD80/CD86-transfected L-DR53; however, anergy was not induced with peptide-pulsed L-DR53 transfected with only CD80 or CD86. These data highlight that costimulation plays a dominant role in maintaining peripheral tolerance to PBCspecific Ags. They further suggest that, under specific circumstances, molecular mimicry of an autoantigen.may restore rather than break peripheral tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据