4.2 Article

Polymorphisms in folate and homocysteine metabolizing genes and chromosome damage mothers of down syndrome children

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 143A, 期 17, 页码 2006-2015

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31886

关键词

micronuclei; MTHFR; RFC-1; MTR; folate and homocysteine metabolism; gene polymorphisms; Down syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We recently observed an association between combinations of polymorphisms in the methylenctetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR 677C > T or 1298A > Q and reduced folate carrier (RFC-1 80G >A) genes and the risk of a Down syndrome (DS) pregnancy in young Italian women. Others have observed an association between a methionine synthase (MTR 2756A > G) gene polymorphism and the risk of a DS offspring in Italy. Moreover, in a separate study, we observed an increased frequency of both binucleated micronucleated cells (BNMN) and chromosome malsegregation events in peripheral lymphocytes of mothers of DS individuals aged less than 35 years at conception (MDS) in respect to controls. The aim of the present study was to evaluate chromosome damage, measured by means of the micronucleus assay, in peripheral lymphocytes of a group of women (n = 34) who had a DS child in young age (< 35 years) and in a control group (n = 35), and to correlate them with MTHFR 677C > T and 1298A > C, PFC-1 8OG > A and MTR 2756A > G polymorphisms. We observed an increased frequency of BNMN in the MDS group compared to the control group (17.13 +/- 8.31%o vs. 10.28 +/- 4.53%o; P < 0.001), and, in the general population, a correlation between years of age and BNMN frequency (P=0.05). A significant correlation between the frequency of BNMN and the MTHFR 677C > T polymorphism (P=0.038) was also found. Present results indicate that MDS are more prone to chromosome damage than control mothers; moreover the contribution of folate and homocysteine metabolizing gene polymorphisms seems to have an effect on the baseline frequency of BNMN lymphocytes. 0 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据