4.7 Article

The two-component afterglow of Swift GRB 050802

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12054.x

关键词

gamma-rays : bursts

资金

  1. STFC [PP/E001173/1, ST/F006489/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PPA/A/R/2003/00380, ST/F006489/1, PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates GRB 050802, one of the best examples of a Swift gamma-ray burst afterglow that shows a break in the X-ray light curve, while the optical counterpart decays as a single power law. This burst has an optically bright afterglow of 16.5 mag, detected throughout the 170-650 nm spectral range of the Ultraviolet and Optical Telescope (UVOT) onboard Swift. Observations began with the X-ray Telescope and UVOT telescopes 286 s after the initial trigger and continued for 1.2 x 10(6) s. The X-ray light curve consists of three power-law segments: a rise until 420 s, followed by a slow decay with alpha= 0.63 +/- 0.03 until 5000 s, after which, the light curve decays faster with a slope of alpha(3)= 1.59 +/- 0.03. The optical light curve decays as a single power law with alpha(O) = 0.82 +/- 0.03 throughout the observation. The X-ray data on their own are consistent with the break at 5000 s being due to the end of energy injection. Modelling the optical to X-ray spectral energy distribution, we find that the optical afterglow cannot be produced by the same component as the X-ray emission at late times, ruling out a single-component afterglow. We therefore considered two-component jet models and find that the X-ray and optical emission is best reproduced by a model in which both components are energy injected for the duration of the observed afterglow and the X-ray break at 5000 s is due to a jet break in the narrow component. This bright, well-observed burst is likely a guide for interpreting the surprising finding of Swift that bursts seldom display achromatic jet breaks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据