4.7 Article

Determination of urinary bisphenol A by coacervative microextraction and liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 630, 期 1, 页码 19-27

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.09.060

关键词

Bisphenol A; Urine; Coacervative microextraction; Human exposure; Liquid chromatography; Fluorescence

资金

  1. Andalusian Government Gunta de Andalucia, Spain [FQM 166]
  2. Spanish MEC [AP 2003-5344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Total (free plus conjugated) urinary BPA is currently being used to assess human exposure to this contaminant. This work proposes the use of coacervates made up of reverse micelles of decanoic acid for the microextraction of BPA, prior to its determination by liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection (lambda(ex) = 276 nm and lambda(em) = 306 nm), with the aim of simplifying sample treatment and reducing analysis time and costs in epidemiologic studies. The procedure involves the enzymatic hydrolysis of 7 mL of urine and then the addition of decanoic acid (100 mg) and tetrahydrofurane (1 mL), conditions under which the coacervate (extractant phase, similar to 167 mu L) forms in situ and instantaneously. The overall procedure takes about 20 min and several samples can be simultaneously treated using conventional lab equipment (i.e. stirrers and centrifuges). Extractions were independent of the pH and temperature in the ranges studied (1-4 and 25-50 degrees C) rendering the method robust. Recoveries in samples ranged between 88 and 95% and the practical detection limit was 0.197 mu g L-1, which is below the usual concentrations of BPA in urine (ranges reported 0.4-149 mu g L-1). The actual concentration factor provided by the method was 38. The precision of the method, expressed as relative standard deviation, was 4.5%. The method was successfully applied to the determination of total BPA in urine from eight healthy volunteers. BPA was detected in all the samples at concentrations ranging between 4.03 and 49 mu g L-1. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据