4.5 Article

Botulinum toxin A, evidence-based exercise therapy, and constraint-induced movement therapy for upper-limb hemiparesis attributable to stroke: A preliminary study

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31813e2b4d

关键词

rehabilitation; stroke; botulinum toxin; constraint-induced movement therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether the combination of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) treatment for the upper limb and a 4-wk course of exercise therapy could improve motor function sufficiently to allow those with poststroke hemiparesis and spasticity to achieve the minimal motor criteria (MMC) to be enrolled in constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), and to determine the feasibility of enrolling participants into CIMT if they meet MMC after treatment with a combination of BTX-A plus exercise therapy. Design: Twelve individuals received BTX-A and exercise therapy for 1 hr/day, three times per week, for 4 wks. Those who met MMC were enrolled in 2 wks of CIMT, and the rest received a home exercise program. Outcome Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), measures included the Ashworth Scale, the Motor Activity Log (MAL), the Box and Blocks Test (BBT), and the upper-extremity subtest of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Function (FM-UE). Results: Ashworth Scale scores declined from a mean score of 2.0-1.2 (P = 0.01). Four of 12 subjects were able to achieve MMC (P = 0.026). CIMT participants improved in the BBT, the MAL, and the WMFT compared with their own baseline. Gains achieved during CIMT receded by week 24 as spasticity returned. Conclusion: BTX-A plus exercise therapy shows potential to improve function for those with severe hand paresis and spasticity after stroke. Those who meet MMC may initially realize further modest gains through CIMT. However, gains are likely to recede as spasticity returns. Adding medications or modifying the therapy protocol to include activities such as functional neuromuscular stimulation or robotic training may yield a more potent effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据