4.7 Article

Analysis of catecholamines and their metabolites in adrenal gland by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 609, 期 2, 页码 192-200

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.01.017

关键词

catecholamine; metabolite; liquid chromatography; tandem mass spectrometry; adrenal gland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two simple, rapid and specific analytical methods for 13 catecholamines and their metabolites have been developed based on liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in a multiple reaction monitoring mode. Tyrosine, dopamine, dihydroxyphenylalanine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, 3-methoxytyramine, normetanephrine, metanephrine and isoproterenol (internal standard) were separated on a Kromasil (TM) Cyano, analytical column by a mobile phase consisting of 60% (v/v) acetonitrile and 40% (v/v) water adjusted with formic acid to pH 3.0, and detected by positive ionization electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. While vanillymandelic acid, 3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid, homovanillic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylglycol and 5-hydroxy-2-indolecarboxylic acid (internal standard) were separated on a reversed-phase Shim-Pak VP-ODS column with the mobile phase of 60% (v/v) acetonitrile, and 40% (v/v) water adjusted with formic acid to pH 4.5 and detected in the negative ionization electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. The influence of various parameters such as column type and mobile phase composition on separation and sensitivity were investigated. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.5-20 ng mL(-1). The mean recoveries determined from three different concentrations of each analyte were above 85.4%. The precision of the method calculated as relative standard deviation was lower than 5.3%. Deduced from the results of real sample analysis, adrenal gland synthesizes and stores the catecholamine hormones norepinephrine and epinephrine. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据