4.7 Article

Dependence of calibration sensitivity of a polysulfone/Ru(II)-Tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline)-based oxygen optical sensor on its structural parameters

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 627, 期 2, 页码 239-246

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.019

关键词

Luminescence oxygen sensors; Ru(II) complexes; Polysulfone; ASY factor

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The optimum performance of an optical oxygen sensor based on polysulfone (PSF)/[Ru(II)-Tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline)] octylsulfonate (Ru(dpp)OS) was checked by carefully tuning the parameters affecting the membrane preparation. In particular, membranes having thickness ranging between 0.2 and 8.0 mu m with various luminophore concentrations were prepared by dip-coating and tested. The membrane thickness was controlled by tuning the solution viscosity, and was measured both by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and by visible spectroscopy (Vis). Luminescence-quenching-based calibration was a single value of the Stern-Volmer constant (K-SV') for membranes containing up to 20 mmol Ru(dpp) g(-1) PSF (1.35 mu m average thickness). The K-SV' value decreased for larger-concentration. The highest sensitivity was obtained with membrane thickness around 1.6 mu m, having a response time close to 1 s. Thicker membranes exhibited an emission saturation effect and were characterized by longer response time. The K-SV' behavior was interpreted on the basis of a mathematical approach accounting for the contribution of luminescence life-time (tau(0)), oxygen diffusion coefficient (D-O2) and oxygen solubility inside the membrane (S-O2) establishing the role of all of them and allowing their experimental determination. Moreover, a simple experimental way to estimate K-SV' without needing calibration was proposed. It was based either on the light emission asymmetry or on the percent variation of light emission on passing from pure nitrogen to pure oxygen. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据