4.6 Article

High redshift X-ray galaxy clusters - I. The impact of point sources on the cluster properties

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 472, 期 3, 页码 727-U9

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077466

关键词

galaxies : clusters : general; galaxies : high-redshift; cosmology : observations; galaxies : intergalactic medium X-rays; galaxies : clusters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. The current generation of X-ray observatories like Chandra allows studies with very fine spatial details. It is now possible to resolve X-ray point sources projected into the cluster diffuse emission and exclude them from the analysis to estimate the correct X-ray observables. Aims. We wish to verify the incidence of point sources on the cluster thermal emission and to evaluate the impact of their non-thermal emission on the determination of cluster properties. Methods. To these ends we use a sample of 18 high-z (0.25 < z < 1.01) clusters from the Chandra archive and subtract the non-thermal emission of the point sources from the extended thermal emission due to the cluster itself. We perform a detailed analysis of the cluster properties and compare the changes observed in the X-ray observables, like temperature and luminosity or their interrelation, when one keeps the point sources in the analysis. Results. The point sources projected into the cluster extended emission affect the estimates of cluster temperature or luminosity considerably ( up to 13% and 17% respectively). These percentages become even larger for clusters with z > 0.7 where temperature and luminosity increase up to 24% and 22%, respectively. Conclusions. The conclusions are that point sources should be removed to correctly estimate the cluster properties. However the inclusion of the point sources does not impact significantly the slope and normalization of the L-bol-T relationship since for each cluster the correction to be applied to T and L-bol produces a moderate shift in the L-bol-T plane almost parallel to the best-fit of the correct L-bol-T relation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据