4.4 Article

Effects of chronic alcohol exposure on dopamine uptake in rat nucleus accumbens and caudate putamen

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 193, 期 4, 页码 495-501

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-0812-1

关键词

alcohol; voltammetry; brain slices; dopamine; uptake; autoreceptors

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [U01 AA014091, AA014686, AA015179, R21 AA015179, AA015830, R01 AA014445-04, AA013900, AA014091, R21 AA013900, P01 AA021099, AA014445, R01 AA014445, R21 AA015179-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale Existing data strongly suggest that alcohol affects dopamine (DA) neurotransmission in the brain. However, many questions remain about the effects of alcohol on the delicate equilibrium between such neurochemical processes as DA release and uptake. Dysregulation of these processes in the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal systems after chronic alcohol ingestion could be a neuroadaptation contributing to dependence. Objective In the present study, we have employed an alcohol vapor inhalation model to characterize the effects of chronic alcohol exposure on DA dynamics in rat nucleus accumbens (NAc) and caudate putamen (CP) using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) in brain slices. This method provides a unique view of real-time, spatially resolved changes in DA concentration. Results We found that chronic alcohol exposure enhanced DA uptake rates in rat NAc and CP. These changes would have the effect of down-regulating extracellular DA levels, presumably a compensatory effect related to increased DA release by repeated alcohol exposure. The sensitivity of terminal release-regulating DA autoreceptors was not different in alcohol-exposed rats compared with alcohol-naive animals. Conclusions The DA uptake changes after chronic alcohol exposure documented here using FSCV may be associated with a compensatory response of the DA system aimed at decreasing DA signaling. Alterations in autoreceptor function may require relatively long lasting alcohol exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据