4.6 Article

Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 343-348

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem179

关键词

fluid balance; heart, cardiac output; monitoring, arterial pressure; monitoring, cardiopulmonary; monitoring, intratoperative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Corrected flow time (FTc) by oesophageal Doppler is considered to be a 'static' preload index. We evaluated the ability of FTc to predict fluid responsiveness and compared this with the abilities of other preload indices, such as pulse pressure variation (PPV), central venous pressure (CVP), and left ventricular end-diastolic area index (LVEDAI). Methods. Twenty neurosurgical patients were studied. After induction of anaesthesia, FTc, PPV LVEDAI, CVP and stroke volume index (SVI) were measured before and 12 min after fluid loading with 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution (7 ml kg(-1)). Responders and non-responders were defined as those patients with an SVI increase >= 10% or < 10% after fluid loading, respectively. Pearson's correlation was used to assess correlations between changes in SVI and initial haemodynamic variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared to evaluate the overall performance of preload indices (FTc, PPV LVEDAI, and CVP) in terms of predicting fluid responsiveness. Results. FTc and PPV before fluid loading differed between responders (n = 11) and non-responders (n=9), and correlated with changes in SVI (r = -0.515 and r = 0.696, respectively), which was opposite to that observed for CVP or LVEDAI. Areas under ROC curves for FTc [0.944 (SD 0.058)] and PPV [0.909 (0.069)] were significantly greater than those for CVP [0.540 (0.133), P < 0.001] and LVEDAI (0.495 (0.133), P < 0.001]. The optimal threshold value given by ROC analysis was 357 ms for FTc. Conclusions. In this study, FTc predicted fluid responsiveness. However, FTc should be used in conjunction with other clinical information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据