4.5 Article

Lifespan of etoposide-treated human neutrophils is affected by antioxidant ability of quercetin

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 1020-1030

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.03.005

关键词

Neutrophils; etoposide; quercetin; DNA damage; apoptosis; reactive oxygen species; etoposide phenoxyl radicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutropenia is the primary dose-limiting effect of etoposide toxicity resulting in a decreased efficiency of cancer treatment. Hence, the protection of neutrophils has important clinical implications. We investigated whether quercetin, due to its antioxidant properties, is able to modulate the damaging activity of etoposide. DNA damage, evaluated by the comet assay, and apoptosis, determined by FACScan flow cytometry using Annexin/PI, increased with etoposide doses. The intracellular level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was enhanced in resting neutrophils incubated with etoposide at concentrations up to 25 mu M; above this concentration etoposide revealed antioxidant properties. Only in latex-activated neutrophils, i.e. with latex-stimulated respiratory burst was the ROS production inhibited, as assessed by the luminol amplified chemiluminescence. The characteristic electron spin resonance (ESR) signal of etoposide phenoxyl radical, which occurs in the presence of myeloperoxidase, H2O2 and etoposide, was quenched by quercetin in a dose-dependent manner (0.1-0.5 mu M). Quercetin also inhibited DNA damage induced by etoposide and enhanced the inhibitory action of etoposide on the ROS formation in neutrophils. However, quercetin (1 mu M) lowered early and late apoptosis/necrosis only when apoptosis was induced by 25 mu M etoposide; at higher etoposide concentration apoptosis was enhanced. Summing up, antioxidant adjuvant therapy using quercetin can be beneficial in prolonging neutrophils' lifespan in peripheral blood only when etoposide plasma concentration is low. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据