4.6 Article

G-quadruplex DNAzymes-induced highly selective and sensitive colorimetric sensing of free heme in rat brain

期刊

ANALYST
卷 139, 期 8, 页码 1993-1999

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3an02025h

关键词

-

资金

  1. 973 Program [2011CB302100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21121063, 51172244]
  3. NSAF [11076027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct selective determination of free heme in the cerebral system is of great significance due to the crucial roles of free heme in physiological and pathological processes. In this work, a G-quadruplex DNAzymes-induced highly sensitive and selective colorimetric sensing of free heme in rat brain is established. Initially, the conformation of an 18-base G-rich DNA sequence, PS2. M (5'-GTGGGTAGGGCGGGTTGG-3'), in the presence of K+, changes from a random coil to a parallel G-quadruplex structure, which can bind free heme in the cerebral system with high affinity through pi-pi stacking. The resulted heme/G-quadruplex complex exhibits high peroxidase-like activity, which can be used to catalyze the oxidation of colorless ABTS(2) to green ABTSc(center dot) by H2O2. The concentration of heme can be evaluated by the naked eye and determined by UV-vis spectroscopy. The signal output showed a linear relationship for heme within the concentration range from 1 to 120 nM with a detection limit of 0.637 nM. The assay demonstrated here was highly selective and free from the interference of physiologically important species such as dopamine (DA), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), ascorbate acid (AA), cysteine, uric acid (UA), glucose and lactate in the cerebral system. The basal dialysate level of free heme in the microdialysate from the striatum of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats was determined to be 32.8 +/- 19.5 nM (n = 3). The analytic protocol possesses many advantages, including theoretical simplicity, low-cost technical and instrumental demands, and responsible detection of heme in rat brain microdialysate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据