4.6 Article

Accuracy of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging tractography assessed using intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping and magnetic source imaging

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 488-494

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/JNS-07/09/0488

关键词

diffusion tensor imaging; fiber tracking; magnetic source imaging; motor tract; subcortical stimulation mapping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object. Resecting brain tumors involves the risk of damaging the descending motor pathway. Diffusion tensor (DT)-imaged fiber tracking is a noninvasive magnetic resonance (MR) technique that can delineate the subcortical course of the motor pathway. The goal of this study was to use intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping of the motor tract and magnetic source imaging to validate the utility of DT-imaged fiber tracking as a tool for presurgical planning. Methods. Diffusion tensor-imaged fiber tracks of the motor tract were generated preoperatively in nine patients with gliomas. A mask of the resultant fiber tracks was overlaid on high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted anatomical MR images and used for stereotactic surgical navigation. Magnetic source imaging was performed in seven of the patients to identify functional somatosensory cortices. During resection, subcortical stimulation mapping of the motor pathway was performed within the white matter using a bipolar electrode. Results. A total of 16 subcortical motor stimulations were stereotactically identified in nine patients. The mean distance between the stimulation sites and the DT-imaged fiber tracks was 8.7 +/- 3.1 mm (+/- standard deviation). The measured distance between subcortical stimulation sites and DT-imaged fiber tracks combines tracking technique errors and all errors encountered with stereotactic navigation. Conclusions. Fiber tracks delineated using DT imaging can be used to identify the motor tract in deep white matter and define safety margin around the tract.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据