4.3 Article

Basin geochemistry and isotopic ratios of fishes and basal production sources in four neotropical rivers

期刊

ECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER FISH
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 267-281

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2006.00218.x

关键词

biogeochemistry; blackwater; feeding; groups; food web; trophic position

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analysed stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic ratios of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), plants, detritus and fishes to estimate the relative importance of dominant production sources supporting food webs of four Venezuelan rivers with divergent geochemical and watershed characteristics. Based on samples taken during the dry season at each site, fishes from two nutrient-poor, blackwater rivers had significantly lower delta C-13 values (mean = -31.47%(o) and -32.97%(o)) than fishes from more productive clearwater and whitewater rivers (mean = -25.2%(o) and -25.6%(o) respectively). Low carbon isotopic ratios of fishes from blackwaters were likely influenced by low delta C-13 of DIC assimilated by aquatic primary producers. Although floodplains of three savanna rivers supported high biomass of C-4 grasses, relatively little carbon from this source appeared to be assimilated by fishes. Most fishes in each system assimilated carbon derived mostly from a combination of microalgae and C-3 macrophytes, two sources with broadly overlapping carbon isotopic signatures. Even with this broad overlap, several benthivorous grazers from blackwater and whitewater rivers had isotopic values that aligned more closely with algae. We conclude that comparative stable isotopic studies of river biota need to account for watershed geochemistry that influences the isotopic composition of basal production sources. Moreover, isotopic differences between river basins can provide a basis for discriminating spatial and temporal variation in the trophic ecology of fishes that migrate between watersheds having distinct geochemical characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据