4.1 Article

Outbreak of beriberi in a prison in Cote d'Ivoire

期刊

FOOD AND NUTRITION BULLETIN
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 283-290

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/156482650702800304

关键词

beriberi; Cote d'Ivoire; outbreak; prison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. A beriberi outbreak occurred in the Maison d'Arret et de Correction d'Abidjan (MACA), a detention center in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire, between October 2002 and April 2003. Objective. A retrospective investigation was conducted to document the outbreak in April 2003. Methods. A descriptive analysis and a case-control study were performed. A probable case patient was defined as a person detained in the center between October 2002 and April 2003 with at least two of the following symptoms: bilateral leg edema, dyspnea, positive squat test, motor deficiencies, and paresthesia. A definite case patient was defined as a probable case patient who showed clinical improvement under thiamin treatment. Results. Of 712 cases reported, 115 (16%) were probable and 597 (84%) were definite. The overall attack rate was 14.1%, and the case fatality rate was 1.0% (7/712). The highest attack rate was reported in the building housing prisoners with long-term sentences (16.9%). All patients were male, and the mean age was 28 years. During the period studied, the penal ration provided a fifth of the quantity of thiamin recommended by international standards. After adjustment for potential confounders, a history of cholera infection (adjusted odds ratio [ORa], 12.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9 to 54.1) and incarceration in the building for severe penalties (ORa, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 18.5) were associated with the disease. Conclusions. Beriberi has been underreported among prisoners. Further attention should be given to its risk factors, especially a history of acute diarrhea. Systematic food supplementation with vitamins and micronutrients should be discussed when the penal ration does not provide the necessary nutrient intake recommended according to international standards.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据