4.3 Article

Flavonoids of Lonchocarpus montanus AMG Azevedo and biological activity

期刊

ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 351-367

出版社

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/S0001-37652007000300001

关键词

Lonchocarpus montanus AMG Azevedo; leguminosae; dibenzoylmethanes; flavonoids; flavones; benzophenone; bioautography; Artemia salina lethality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of root extracts from Lonchocarpus montanus A.M.G. Azevedo resulted in the isolation of twenty three compounds chiefly flavonoids of which five (four flavonoids and one benzophenone) are described for the first time. The molecular structures of the new compounds (1-5) were determined through spectral analysis (UV, IR, MS and NMR) as being: 2'-hydroxy-8-(alpha,alpha-dimethylallyl)-2,2-dimethyl-pyrano-(5,6:3',4')-dibenzoylmethane(1), 2'-methoxy-8-(alpha,alpha-dimethylallyl)-2, 2- dimethylpyrano(5, 6: 3', 4')-dibenzoylmethane (2), 4'-methoxy-2, 2- dimethylpyrano-(5, 6:8,7)-flavone (3), 2-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)- furano-(4,5:8,7)- flavone (4) and [2'-methoxy-furano-(4,5:3',4')- phenyl]phenylmethanone (5). Additionally, fifteen fatty acids were detected through GC- MS analysis of the corresponding methyl esters [(CH3)(2)CH(CH2)(8)COOH and CH3(CH2)(n)COOH (n = 6, 12- 24)]. Quantitative RP- HPLC showed that the most abundant flavonoids in the petroleum ether and dichloromethane extracts were pongamol (19%) and lanceolatine B (8.0%), respectively. In the bioautography assay, the extracts, pongamol ( 9), lanceolatine B (10), isolonchocarpin (14), derriobtusone A (17) and medicarpine ( 18) were active against Staphilococus aureus whereas 9 also against Bacillus subtilis and Cladosporium cladosporioides. Compound 1, 2, 2-dimethylpyrano-(5, 6:8,7)- flavone (11) and furano-(12, 13:7,8)-4'- methoxy flavone (12) were active against Fusarium oxysporium whereas 11 also against Rhizopus orizae. The extracts, compounds 9, 10, 17 and (E)-7- O- methoxypongamol (23) displayed high toxicity in the brine shrimp lethality assay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据