4.4 Article

Observed physical working conditions in a sample of call centres in Sweden and their relations to directives, recommendations and operators' comfort and symptoms

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS
卷 37, 期 9-10, 页码 790-800

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.06.006

关键词

computer work; ergonomics; office; recommendations; comfort; physical environment; measurements; indoor climate; sound; vision ergonomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A survey of physical work conditions was performed in a strategic sample of call centres in Sweden. Extensive observations including measurements of work environment factors took place at 16 companies, involving 156 operators and their workstations. Observed conditions were compared with current directives and recommendations and also with the operators' ratings of comfort and reported symptoms. Internal and external call centres working in the whole range of task complexity were compared. The air quality and thermal climate in the workplace were mainly satisfactory, but air humidity was low. Sound levels were often high at many workstations and illuminance too low. Glare and reflexions in the VDU-screens were common. The observations indicate that the conditions quite often were out of range of current directives and recommendations for sound working environment. The indoor climate, the air quality, the ambient noise level and the illumination created dissatisfaction of comfort among about 74% the operators. Correlations between the ratings of comfort and the observations were moderate, but most were statistically significant. No significant associations between symptoms (eyes, ears, throat, skin or headache) and the observations were found. Relevance to industry The study provides useful data both for designing call centres and similar offices and for improvement of the physical work environment. It points out which physical factors and environment-related symptoms one should be especially aware of among call centre workers. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据