3.8 Article

Increased CK19 expression correlated with pathologic differentiation grade and prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.019

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To investigate cytokeratin 19 (CK19) expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) tissue as well as its correlation with pathologic differentiation grade and prognosis. Study design. Cancerous and distant tissues from 33 primary OSCC patients were collected during surgery. Each sample was divided into 2 parts, one for CK19 protein detection using immunohistochemistry, and the other for CK19 mRNA-level detection of relative quantification using fluorescent real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results. The CK19 positive rate in cancerous tissue was 90.9% ( 30 out of 33) detected using immunohistochemistry, which was significantly higher than that in distant tissue (15.2%, 5 out of 33) by chi-square test (P < .001). The CK19 positive score in cancerous tissue was also significantly higher than that in the corresponding distant tissue by paired samples t test (P < .001). Patients with positive CK19 expression in distant tissue had higher tumor recurrence rate (P = .008) and lower survival rate (P = .015) than those with negative CK19 expression in distant tissue. Using fluorescent real-time RT-PCR, CK19 mRNA level in cancerous tissue was 2.21-fold higher than that in distant tissue (P = .020). The CK19 expression correlated significantly with pathologic differentiation grade, which was detected not only using immunohistochemistry (P = .002) but also using fluorescent real-time RT-PCR (P = .025), poorer differentiated indicating higher CK19 positive score and CK19 mRNA level. Conclusions. Increased CK19 protein expression and gene transcription in OSCC tissue correlate significantly with pathologic differentiation grade. Positive CK19 expression in distant tissue suggests a higher tumor recurrence rate and a lower survival rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据