4.6 Article

Effects of copper on the sorption of phthalate esters to yellow river sediment

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 184, 期 1-4, 页码 207-216

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-007-9409-x

关键词

carbonates; complexation; copper; phthalate esters; sorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sorption of hydrophobic organic pollutants on soils or sediments has been widely studied. However, more attention in the previous studies has been paid to sorption mechanism and effects of relevant environmental factors, few studies were reported on effects of heavy metals on the sorption of hydrophobic organic pollutants. In this paper, sorption of phthalate esters (diethyl phthalate, DEP, and di-n-butyl phthalate, DnBP) and copper on the Yellow River sediment was investigated with particular attention to the effects of copper on the phthalate sorption. The experimental results show that the sorption isotherms of phthalates could be reasonably described by the Freundlich equation. Higher sorption equilibrium constant was obtained for DnBP due to its greater hydrophobicity. The existence of copper would enhance the sorption of DnBP. Moreover, strong sorption of copper to sediment were found and attributed to abundant carbonates in the Yellow River sediment. After carbonates were removed, notable effects of copper on the phthalate sorption were observed due to the decrease of copper sorption and the increase of aqueous copper concentration. With 153 mg l(-1)copper added, the partition coefficient decreases by 52% for DEP and increases by 79% for DnBP. Primary factors that may influence interaction between the sorption of copper and DEP and DnBP were also investigated, such as complexation between copper and phthalate, and phthalate hydrophobicity. The complexation between phthalate esters and copper was substantiated by polarogram and fluorescence spectrograph, and the calculated mol ratio of complexation (copper : phthalate) was found to be 2:1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据