4.6 Article

Advanced oxidation using Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles and its application in mercury speciation analysis by high performance liquid chromatography-cold vapor generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry

期刊

ANALYST
卷 138, 期 12, 页码 3494-3501

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3an00010a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science foundation of China [21075085, 21128006]
  2. Outstanding Young Scholar of Sichuan University [2011SCU04A07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel, green and efficient post-column oxidation method using Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) was developed to on-line convert hydride generation/cold vapor generation (HG/CV) inactive species to their active species without microwave/UV irradiation. It was applied to high performance liquid chromatography HG/CV atomic fluorescence spectrometry (HPLC-HG/CV-AFS) to enable sensitive speciation analysis of both HG/CV inactive and active species. Inorganic mercury (Hg2+), methylmercury (MeHg), ethylmercury (EtHg) and phenylmercury (PhHg) were selected as model compounds to validate the methodology. Separation of these mercury species was accomplished on a RP-C18 column with a mixture of acetonitrile and water (10 : 90) at pH 6.8 containing 0.12% (m/v) L-cysteine as the mobile phase. In the presence of 0.6% (v/v) H2O2, on-line conversion of the organomercury species eluted from the HPLC column to Hg2+ was obtained using the advanced oxidation method at pH 2.0. Optimum conditions for the separation, oxidation and cold vapor generation were carefully investigated. The limits of detection (LODs) were 0.7, 1.1, 0.8 and 0.9 mg L-1 (as Hg) for Hg2+, MeHg, EtHg and PhHg, respectively, corresponding to 14, 22, 16 and 18 pg absolute detection limits for Hg2+, MeHg, EtHg and PhHg by using a 20 mu L sample loop, which are comparable to or better than those previously reported. National Research Council Canada DORM-2 fish muscle tissue and several real water samples were analyzed to validate the accuracy of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据