4.8 Article

Activation of insulin-like growth factor signaling induces apoptotic cell death under prolonged hypoxia by enhancing endoplasmic reticulum stress response

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 17, 页码 8095-8103

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3389

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant cells in solid tumors survive under prolonged hypoxia and can be a source of resistance to current cancer therapies. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), one of the downstream molecules of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway, is a key regulator of translation, integrating multiple environmental and nutritional cues. The activity of mTOR is known to be suppressed under hypoxic conditions in cancer cells, whereas the contribution of this suppression to cell survival has not yet been clarified. We show that stimulating IGF signaling provoked caspase-dependent apoptosis under low, oxygen tension in two cancer cell lines, COLO 320 and AsPC-1. In concurrence with increased levels of BAD phosphorylation, cell death was not accompanied by cytochrome c release from mitochondria. The cells were rescued from apoptosis when phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) or mTOR activity was inhibited, suggesting that these signals are critical in the observed cell death. IGFs and insulin enhanced the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response as monitored by induction of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein homologous protein (CHOP) proteins and the X box protein-1 splicing under hypoxic conditions, and this response was suppressed by inhibiting PI3K and mTOR activity. IGF-induced cell death under hypoxic conditions was prevented by treatment with cycloheximide, suggesting that de novo protein synthesis is required. Indeed, suppression of CHOP protein levels with small hairpin RNA reduced cell death. Taken together, the data suggest that stimulating IGF signaling under hypoxic conditions provokes apoptosis by enhancing the ER stress response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据