4.5 Article

Valvular and congenital heart disease - Left ventricular remodeling and change of systolic function after closure of patent ductus arteriosus in adults: Device and surgical closure

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 154, 期 3, 页码 436-440

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.045

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Left ventricular (LV) remodeling and predictors of LV systolic function late after closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in adults remain to be clearly demonstrated. Methods In 45 patients with PDA, including 28 patients who received successful occlusion using the Amplatzer device (AD group) (AGA, Golden Valley, MN) and 17 patients who received surgical closure (OP group), echocardiography studies were performed before closure and 1 day (AD group) or within 7 days (OP group) after closure, and then were repeated at >= 6 months (17 13 months). Results In both groups, LV ejection fraction (EF) and end-diastolic volume index were significantly decreased immediately after closure, whereas end-systolic volume index did not change. During the long-term follow-up period, end-systolic as well as end-diastolic volume indices decreased significantly in both groups and LV EF recovered compared to the immediate postclosure state. However, LV EF remained low compared to the preclosure state. Five patients (11.1%) including 3 patients in the, AD group and 2 patients in the OP group showed persistent late LV systolic dysfunction (EF < 50%). In stepwise, multiple logistic regression analysis, preclosure EF was the only independent predictor of late normal postclosure EF (odds ratio, 1.230; 95% Cl, 1.054-1.434; P = .008). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that preclosure EF >= 62% had a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 83% for predicting late normal LV EF after closure. Conclusions Left ventricular EF remains low late after PDA closure compared with preclosure state in adults. Preclosure LV EF is the best index to predict late postclosure LV EF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据