4.7 Article

Reduction of arthritis following intra-articular administration of an adeno-associated virus serotype 5 expressing a disease-inducible TNF-blocking agent

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 1143-1150

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2006.064519

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In the context of preclinical development, we studied the potential of intra-articular gene delivery using a recombinant adeno-associated virus 5 (rAAV5) encoding a chimeric human tumour necrosis factor alpha(TNF alpha) soluble receptor I linked to a mouse immunoglobulin heavy chain Fc portion ( TNF receptor I; TNFRI-Ig). Methods: Expression was under control of a nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B)-responsive promoter and compared with a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter ( rAAV5. NF kappa B-TNFRI- Ig and rAAV5. CMV-TNFRI-Ig, respectively). Results: Fibroblast-like synoviocytes transduced in vitro with rAAV5. NF kappa B-TNFRI- Ig were able to produce TNFRI-Ig protein in response to several stimuli, and this was inhibited upon treatment with a specific NFkB blocking agent. A bioassay revealed that the synthesised TNFRI-Ig was bioactive, showing a higher affinity for human than for rat TNFa. Transcription of the transgene and protein production were detectable in joints injected with both constructs. No dissemination of the vector was observed outside the joints. A significant reduction in paw swelling was seen in rats treated with rAAV5. NFkB-TNFRI- Ig. This clinical effect was accompanied by a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and an increase in IL10 expression in the synovium. Conclusion: These results provide evidence that intra-articular gene therapy using rAAV5 encoding TNFRI-Ig may be a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The higher affinity for human TNFa suggests that in patients with rheumatoid arthritis the therapeutic effect might be even more pronounced than in rat adjuvant arthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据