4.6 Article

Candida Psilosis - electromigration techniques and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for phenotypical discrimination

期刊

ANALYST
卷 137, 期 8, 页码 1937-1943

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2an15931g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [IAAX00310701]
  2. project CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068]
  3. project IGA [9678-4]
  4. Institutional research plan AVO [Z40310501]
  5. [1M0528]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biofilm-positive strains of Candida parapsilosis are the second most common yeasts responsible for bloodstream infections. This pathogen is difficult to identify by standard methods from other phenotypically indistinguishable species, biofilm-negative Candida orthopsilosis and biofilm-positive Candida metapsilosis. From a medical point of view, important information is especially whether the strains form biofilm. The biofilm formation enables yeast to colonize artificial surfaces thereby protecting the yeast cell against antifungal agents. The commonly used genotypic methods including different modifications of the polymerase chain reaction have some disadvantages. Therefore, a rapid and reliable method able to identify phenotypically indistinguishable C. psilosis species is still of great interest. In this study, the four well-established analytical techniques: gel isoelectric focusing, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, were applied in order to discriminate C. psilosis species. The ability of these techniques to differentiate between biofilm-positive and biofilm-negative strains was further investigated. Our results have revealed that the proposed methods, especially matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of intact yeast cells, can be used as the efficient tools for discrimination and identification of the phenotypically indistinguishable microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据