4.3 Article

Denervation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy is associated with increased mitochondrial ROS production

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00767.2006

关键词

mitochondria; reactive oxygen species; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; copper; zinc superoxide dismutase

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG 20591, 5T3 AG 021890 02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive oxygen species ( ROS), especially mitochondrial ROS, are postulated to play a significant role in muscle atrophy. We report a dramatic increase in mitochondrial ROS generation in three conditions associated with muscle atrophy: in aging, in mice lacking CuZn-SOD ( Sod1(-1-)), and in the neurodegenerative disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ( ALS). ROS generation in muscle mitochondria is nearly threefold higher in 28- to 32-mo-old than in 10-mo-old mice and is associated with a 30% loss in gastrocnemius mass. In Sod1(-1-) mice, muscle mitochondrial ROS production is increased > 100% in 20-mo compared with 5-mo-old mice along with a > 50% loss in muscle mass. ALS G93A mutant mice show a 75% loss of muscle mass during disease progression and up to 12-fold higher muscle mitochondrial ROS generation. In a second ALS mutant model, H46RH48Q mice, ROS production is approximately fourfold higher than in control mice and is associated with a less dramatic loss ( 30%) in muscle mass. Thus ROS production is strongly correlated with the extent of muscle atrophy in these models. Because each of the models of muscle atrophy studied are associated to some degree with a loss of innervation, we were interested in determining whether denervation plays a role in ROS generation in muscle mitochondria isolated from hindlimb muscle following surgical sciatic nerve transection. Seven days postdenervation, muscle mitochondrial ROS production increased nearly 30-fold. We conclude that enhanced generation of mitochondrial ROS may be a common factor in the mechanism underlying denervation-induced atrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据