4.1 Article

Application of the Rietveld refinement method for quantification of mineral concentrations in bauxite residues (alumina refining tailings)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.04.004

关键词

Quantitative phase analysis; Tailings; RIETVELD refinement; Mineral concentrations; Environmental mineralogy

资金

  1. International Aluminium Institute
  2. Sustainable Minerals Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mineral processing tailings are complex mixtures of minerals residual from the parent ore and minerals formed during processing. The number of minerals present in tailings samples, and their unusual composition and structure compared with minerals naturally occurring at the Earth's surface, poses challenges for quantification of mineral concentrations. Determination of mineral concentrations in tailings can be required to meet legislative requirements, to conduct geochemical modeling, and to optimize mineral processing efficiency. This review compares techniques for quantification of mineral concentrations in bauxite residue (alumina refining tailings), as a case study, and highlights major sources of inaccuracy in quantification methods. Although alternative techniques exist for the quantification of mineral concentrations in bauxite residues, Rietveld refinement-based quantitative phase analysis is likely to be more accurate and precise than methods based on chemical extraction, normative calculation, or single X-ray diffraction peaks. The problems of microabsorption, caused by both heavy and light X-ray absorbing minerals being present in a sample, and non-ideal mineral compositions, such as those of minerals formed during ore processing (desilication product minerals, in the case of bauxite residue), are particularly difficult and impractical to eliminate completely; however, they may be minimized by careful sample preparation and analysis, and further characterization of process characteristic minerals. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据