4.4 Article

The role of tooth-grinding in the maintenance of myofascial face pain: A test of alternate models

期刊

PAIN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 486-496

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00206.x

关键词

myofascial pain; temporomandibular disorders; bruxism

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE-11714] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. While mechanisms of myofascial face pain are poorly understood, bruxism has been implicated in the maintenance of this painful disorder. This study evaluates whether evidence of one aspect of bruxism, tooth-grinding, is positively associated with pain severity, as predicted by a psychophysiological model, or negatively associated, as predicted by an adaptation model of face pain. Patients. Participants were 51 women who met Research Diagnostic Criteria for the myofascial subtype of temporomandibular disorder. Outcome Measures. Tooth-grinding was quantified by changes in microwear features of the molar teeth over 2 weeks. Palpated pain severity was quantified on an 11-point scale in response to palpation of the skin overlying the masseter and temporalis muscles bilaterally. Other measures included validated scales of spontaneous pain severity, stress, distress, and psychological symptoms. Association was quantified as Pearson correlation coefficients. Results. Data showed an inverse correlation (r = -0.37, P < 0.05) between palpated pain severity and the index of tooth wear, supporting the adaptation model. This correlation provided a weighted average of a strong effect (r = -0.80, P < 0.01) seen in those women reporting pain only the right side of their face with an effect that approximated zero in those reporting bilateral pain. Tooth wear measures were negatively associated with ratings of pain severity only over the right masseter. Discussion. While these data do not address the role of clenching, they cast serious doubt on the theory that myofascial face pain is maintained by tooth-grinding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据