4.6 Article

Inhibition of HIV-1 infectivity and epithelial cell transfer by human monoclonal IgG and IgA antibodies carrying the b12 V region

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 5, 页码 3144-3152

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.3144

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R37 AI033292, F32 AI010009, AI 33292, R37 AI055332, R01 AI048796, AI 55332, P30 AI 054907, AI 034757, P30 AI054907, R01 AI055332, F32 AI010009-02, AI 48796, R01 AI033292] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD041361, HD 41361] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 059295, K01 DK059295] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both IgG and secretory IgA Abs in mucosal secretions have been implicated in blocking the earliest events in HIV-1 transit across epithelial barriers, although the mechanisms by which this occurs remain largely unknown. In this study, we report the production and characterization of a human rIgA(2) mAb that carries the V regions of IgG1 b12, a potent and broadly neutralizing anti-gp120 Ab which has been shown to protect macaques against vaginal simian/HIV challenge. Monomeric, dimeric, polymeric, and secretory IgA2 derivatives of b12 reacted with gp120 and neutralized CCR5- and CXCR4-tropic strains of HIV-1 in vitro. With respect to the protective effects of these Abs at mucosal surfaces, we demonstrated that IgG1 b12 and IgA, b12 inhibited the transfer of cell-free HIV-1 from ME-180 cells, a human cervical epithelia] cell line, as well as Caco-2 cells, a human colonic epithelial cell line, to human PBMCs. Inhibition of viral transfer was due to the ability of b12 to block both viral attachment to and uptake by epithelial cells. These data demonstrate that IgG and IgA MAbs directed against a highly conserved epitope on gp120 can interfere with the earliest steps in HIV-1 transmission across mucosal surfaces, and reveal a possible mechanism by which b12 protects the vaginal mucosal against viral challenge in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据