4.1 Article

Optimization of the microwave roasting extraction of palladium and rhodium from spent automobile catalysts using response surface analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.08.007

关键词

Rh; Pd; Spent automobile catalysts; Microwave roasting extraction; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51104073]
  2. Yunnan Province Young Academic Technology Leader Reserve Talents [2012HB008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The optimum conditions for the extraction of palladium and rhodium from spent automobile catalysts by microwave roasting were determined using response surface methodology (RSM). A central composite design (CCD) was used to investigate the effects of three independent variables (namely proportion (m/m, reagent/material), roasting temperature (degrees C) and holding time (min)) on the leaching rate of palladium and rhodium. The independent variables were coded at three levels and their actual values based on experimental results. The CCD consisted of 20 experimental points and six replications at the center point. Data were analyzed using design expert and statistical analysis system software. A second-order polynomial model was used for predicting the response. The model explained 53% more variation. Canonical analysis of surface responses shows that the stationary surface was a saddle. The optimal conditions for the leaching rate of palladium and rhodium obtained using ridge analysis were 9.75, 550 degrees C, 60 min; 9.00, 540 degrees C, 50 min; and 9.96, 550 degrees C, 53.84 min, respectively. The predicted leaching rate of palladium is more than 99.29% and the predicted leaching rate of rhodium is more than 95.34% under three optimum conditions. In order to obtain the highest leaching rate, the conditions for the extraction of palladium and rhodium were tuned to 10, 550 degrees C, 60 min. The actual leaching rates of palladium and rhodium were 99.33% and 95.48% at the tuned conditions, which are very similar to those predicted by RSM models. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据