4.6 Article

Determination of IGF-1 and IGF-2, their degradation products and synthetic analogues in urine by LC-MS/MS

期刊

ANALYST
卷 136, 期 5, 页码 1003-1012

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0an00632g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Manfred Donike Institute for Doping Analysis, Cologne, Germany
  2. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
  3. Federal Ministry of the Interior of the Federal Republic of Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptide analysis in doping controls by means of nano-UPLC coupled high resolution/high mass accuracy mass spectrometry provides the state-of-the-art technique in modern sports drug testing. The present study describes a recent application of this technique for the qualitative determination of different urinary insulin-like growth factor (IGF) related peptides. After simultaneous isolation by solid phase extraction and magnetic particle-based immunoaffinity purification, target analytes (IGF-1, IGF-2, Des1-3-IGF-1, R-3-IGF-1 and longR(3)-IGF-1) were separated by nano-liquid chromatography prior to mass spectrometric detection. Endogenously produced IGF-1 and IGF-2, as well as the degradation product Des1-3-IGF-1, were frequently detected in urine samples from healthy volunteers in a concentration range of 20-400 pg mL(-1). The impact of IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), being also present in urine, was potentially estimated by an additional ultrafiltration step in the sample preparation procedure. The synthetic analogue longR(3)-IGF-1, which is assumed to be subject to misuse by cheating athletes, was also analysed and detected in fortified urine samples. Besides the intact molecule, an N-terminally truncated degradation product Des1-10-longR(3)-IGF-1 was identified as the more stable target for doping controls using urine samples. The method was validated for qualitative purposes considering the parameters specificity, limit of detection (20-50 pg mL(-1)), recovery (10-35%), precision (<20%), linearity, robustness and stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据